The Unobserved

HUMILITY

Have you ever walked into a room full of people for a meeting and immediately felt that peculiar energy suggesting that everyone in the room already knows everything?

Or, more accurately, that everyone believes they know everything.

You sit down.

The meeting begins.

And within five minutes you realise that this is not going to be a conversation at all.

It is going to be a collection of simultaneous monologues.

Everyone is waiting patiently for everyone else to shut up so they can finally explain the universal truth.

Or perhaps you have been arguing with your partner and, at some point, simply stopped.

Not because they convinced you.

Not because you suddenly realised they were right.

You just understood that no argument — however logical, elegant or carefully constructed — was going to enter that particular system today.

So you say:

You're right.

And peace returns to the universe.

Or maybe you have been at that dinner with friends where everyone suddenly becomes an expert on the life decisions of the only person who isn't sitting at the table.

Or watched someone who once had very little become wealthy and slowly forget every lesson generosity taught them when they had nothing.

Or met the person with five degrees, three master's degrees, two doctorates and ten languages who has somehow concluded that all those years of studying have earned them the remarkable ability to be correct about absolutely everything.

Uff.

Anyway.

I think you know what I mean.

Humility.

Or rather, the curious human shortage of it.

When Did We Decide We Knew Everything?

I genuinely wonder what happened to us.

At what point did not knowing become embarrassing?

When did changing our minds become weakness?

When did I don't know become something we were supposed to hide?

Because, to me, one of the most beautiful things about being alive is precisely that there is always something else to discover.

Another person.

Another idea.

Another country.

Another theorem.

Another version of something you were absolutely certain you understood.

And then one day you discover that you were wrong.

Wonderful.

You just found another door.

Yet we spend an extraordinary amount of energy protecting ourselves from those doors.

If I had to define a lack of humility from what I have observed in my own life, I would probably describe it as some combination of diminished kindness, excessive ego and a closed mind.

And I say that carefully.

Because I have also lived through moments when I had to consciously remind myself not to become exactly that person.

Humility is easy when life gives you nothing with which to feel superior.

The interesting part begins when it does.

The Aliens

Since I apparently cannot explain anything without telling a story, here is one.

Years ago, I was having dinner with a group of friends.

One person at the table was passionately explaining conspiracy theories.

Aliens.

Elites.

Plans for human extermination.

The usual light dinner conversation.

I couldn't stop laughing.

Not necessarily because I thought he was wrong.

I was laughing because some of the scenarios were so extraordinary that simply visualising them was enough to destroy me.

Sitting at the same table was another man with a completely different personality.

Extremely well read.

Educated.

Successful.

Respectable career.

The sort of person I privately call Mr Encyclopedia.

Mr Encyclopedia knew things.

A lot of things.

The problem was that sometimes it seemed as though he knew them because somebody else had written them first.

Whatever the alien man proposed, Mr Encyclopedia immediately produced a counterargument.

Logical.

Structured.

Reasonable.

And somehow... too perfect.

His arguments felt rehearsed rather than discovered.

One person was willing to believe almost anything.

The other seemed willing to believe only what already fitted inside the architecture of what he knew.

And if you forced me to choose which one interested me more?

I would probably choose the aliens.

Not because aliens automatically make more sense.

Obviously.

But because there is something about absolute intellectual certainty that makes me deeply uncomfortable.

A ridiculous hypothesis can be rejected after examination.

A closed mind rejects the examination itself.

And I think that is a much more interesting problem.

Because humility has very little to do with how much money you have, how educated you are, how many books you have read or how many letters appear after your name.

Intellectual humility is the ability to look at something you have believed for twenty years and still leave a tiny door open for one terrifying possibility:

What if I'm wrong?

A Probability, Not a Certainty

Quantum mechanics is particularly good at humiliating our intuition.

For centuries, physics encouraged a seductive picture of reality: know the state of a system well enough, understand the laws governing it, and prediction follows.

Quantum mechanics complicated that picture profoundly.

The theory does not generally hand us certainty about the outcome of an individual measurement.

It gives us probabilities.

A quantum state can allow us to calculate the probabilities of possible measurement outcomes with extraordinary precision, while still refusing to tell us which particular outcome we will obtain before we measure it.

I find that beautiful.

Because one of the most successful theories human beings have ever constructed does not require nature to satisfy our desire for certainty.

It calculates what can be calculated.

And where the theory gives probabilities, it gives probabilities.

Perhaps there is a lesson there.

Not everything we don't understand is nonsense.

Not everything we believe is truth.

And uncertainty is not the same thing as ignorance.

Sometimes uncertainty is the most accurate answer available.

There is enormous humility in saying:

I don't know yet.

No System Is Completely Alone

There is another quantum idea I find even more interesting here.

Decoherence.

A perfectly isolated quantum system is a useful idealisation.

But real systems interact with environments.

Particles do not exist inside philosophical glass boxes. They interact with other degrees of freedom, exchange information with their surroundings, and become entangled with them.

Through those interactions, quantum coherence between alternatives can become effectively inaccessible when we consider only the subsystem.

The system has not simply decided what reality is by itself.

Its environment matters.

And perhaps this is where the metaphor becomes useful.

We like to imagine ourselves as isolated systems.

My opinions.

My intelligence.

My success.

My truth.

But none of us developed in a vacuum.

Someone taught you to read.

Someone challenged you.

Someone loved you.

Someone rejected you.

Someone wrote the book that changed your mind.

Someone asked the question you had never considered.

Even the ideas we proudly call our own emerged from a lifetime of interaction with other minds.

We are constantly colliding with one another.

Changing one another.

Leaving information behind.

And perhaps arrogance begins when we forget the environment that helped produce the state we currently occupy.

The Ego Has Excellent Survival Instincts

The problem, I think, begins when reality presents something our little minds cannot comfortably integrate.

Something contradicts what we believe.

Someone we considered stupid turns out to be right.

Someone we considered brilliant turns out to be wrong.

A question appears for which our beautiful intellectual architecture has no room.

And the ego panics.

So instead of expanding the architecture, we defend it.

We dismiss.

We ridicule.

We stop listening.

We search for arguments that preserve the version of reality in which we remain comfortably positioned at the centre.

Perhaps humility is simply the willingness to survive the temporary discomfort of discovering that the universe was never required to make sense according to us.

Because there is something wonderful on the other side of that discomfort.

If reality is larger than your understanding of it, then there is still something left to discover.

And if another person can see something you cannot, then another mind is not necessarily a threat to yours.

It may be a door.

That, to me, is where humility becomes almost spiritual.

Not spiritual in the sense of abandoning reason.

Quite the opposite.

It is the willingness to open the mind far enough to connect with something beyond the ego — another person, another perspective, another possibility — without needing to dominate it first.

The Stupid Question

I will finish with one last story.

I once asked a question in class.

My professor told me, in front of everyone, that the question made no sense.

Perhaps, according to everything he knew at that moment, it didn't.

So I did something inconvenient.

I kept the question.

Nobody wanted to answer it, so I spent years working on the answer myself.

And that supposedly meaningless question eventually led me to something worth several million.

I still find that funny.

Not because it proves that I was smarter than my professor.

It doesn't.

He may have known a thousand things I didn't.

And perhaps, had I asked a slightly different question, he would have been completely right.

That is precisely the point.

One person dismissing a question does not make the question worthless.

One authority failing to see a possibility does not make the possibility disappear.

And one success does not make the person who found it infallible either.

The dangerous lesson from that story would be:

I was right.

The useful lesson is:

Keep asking.

Because the moment I use that success as evidence that my next strange idea must also be brilliant, I become Mr Encyclopedia myself.

Just with a different encyclopedia.

And perhaps that is the most difficult form of humility:

to succeed without turning your success into proof of your own omniscience.

To become wealthy without believing money made you wiser.

To become educated without believing education made you infallible.

To win an argument without needing the other person to become smaller.

To discover something without forgetting how much remains undiscovered.

To know a great deal and still be able to say:

I might be wrong.

So never let another person's certainty determine the limits of your curiosity.

But remember something equally important:

don't let your own certainty determine them either.

The universe is considerably larger than both.

Thank God.

Otherwise, what would be left to learn?